Real Estate Syndications: What the PPM Actually Protects You From
Attorney Advertising. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship between Kaelus Law, PLLC and any reader. Laws and regulations referenced herein are subject to change and may vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult qualified counsel regarding their specific circumstances before relying on any information contained in this article.
Introduction
Real estate syndications distribute risk among sponsors and investors by design, not by accident. The private placement memorandum (PPM), commonly referred to as a PPM, is generally the document where that risk allocation is recorded. A well-drafted PPM does not eliminate risk. It documents how risk has been disclosed, assigned, and limited, so that if a dispute later arises, the parties' expectations can be evaluated against what was actually written and disclosed at the time of investment.
This article provides a general overview of what a PPM typically does to protect a real estate fund or sponsor, and what recourse an investor may or may not have if the value of the underlying real estate declines. It is not intended to describe the terms of any specific offering and should not be relied upon as a substitute for reviewing the actual offering documents of any investment.
How a PPM Is Generally Structured to Protect the Fund and Its Sponsor
The specific protections in any PPM depend on how that particular offering is drafted and structured. Common categories of provisions include the following.
Risk Factor Disclosures. PPMs typically include an extensive risk factors section addressing matters such as market volatility, interest rate exposure, illiquidity, construction or renovation risk, tenant default, force majeure events, and general economic conditions affecting real estate values. A thorough risk factors section may help establish that a given risk was disclosed to investors prior to investment, which can be relevant if an investor later raises a claim based on that risk having materialized.
No Guarantee of Return. PPMs generally include express disclaimers stating that past performance is not indicative of future results and that no specific return, distribution, or outcome is guaranteed. Forward-looking statements are typically qualified accordingly.
Sponsor Indemnification and Exculpation Provisions. Operating agreements and PPMs commonly include provisions limiting a manager's or sponsor's liability to acts involving gross negligence, willful misconduct, or fraud, and may provide for indemnification of the manager by the fund for actions taken within the scope of authority granted under the governing documents. The scope and enforceability of these provisions vary by jurisdiction and by the specific language used.
Manager Discretion Language. Governing documents typically grant the manager broad discretion over operational and investment decisions, which may be relevant to a business judgment analysis if a decision is later challenged.
Subscription Agreement Representations. Investors typically represent, among other things, their accredited investor status, their financial sophistication, and that they have had the opportunity to conduct independent due diligence and review the offering documents prior to investing. These representations may be relevant if an investor later claims reliance on information outside the offering documents.
Dispute Resolution Provisions. Many PPMs and operating agreements include forum selection clauses, arbitration provisions, or jury trial waivers governing how disputes between investors and the sponsor are to be resolved.
Exemption Compliance. Offerings conducted under Regulation D are structured to comply with the applicable exemption from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act. Proper compliance with exemption requirements may be relevant to claims involving rescission based on the manner in which the offering was conducted.
The presence of these provisions in a given PPM does not guarantee any particular legal outcome. Their effect depends on the specific facts, the specific drafting, and the law of the governing jurisdiction.
What Recourse May Be Available to an Investor if Property Values Decline
As a general matter, a decline in the value of underlying real estate is not, by itself, a basis for legal recourse against a sponsor. Real estate investment carries inherent market risk, and that risk is typically disclosed as such in the offering documents. Depreciation, standing alone, is generally treated as a realized business risk rather than a breach of any obligation owed to investors.
Recourse may potentially exist, depending on the facts, in circumstances such as the following.
A material misrepresentation or omission in the PPM or related offering materials, which may implicate federal securities law (including Rule 10b-5) or applicable state blue sky statutes.
A breach of fiduciary duty by the manager or sponsor, such as undisclosed self-dealing or undisclosed conflicts of interest.
A breach of the operating agreement or fund agreement itself, such as the manager acting outside the scope of authority granted under the governing documents.
Failure to honor a distribution waterfall, reporting obligation, or other contractual term set forth in the governing documents.
Investors generally cannot compel an early sale of fund assets, demand redemption outside the terms of the governing documents, or bring a claim based solely on underperformance relative to projections. Illiquidity is typically a structural feature of these investments, and PPMs commonly disclose the absence of a secondary market and the presence of lock-up or hold periods as inherent risks assumed by the investor.
Whether any particular set of facts gives rise to a viable claim depends on the specific governing documents, the applicable jurisdiction, and the facts and circumstances involved. Nothing in this article should be read as an opinion regarding any specific transaction, and this general discussion should not be relied upon in place of a review of the actual, current offering documents applicable to any investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a PPM the same as a subscription agreement?
No. A PPM is generally the disclosure document describing the offering, the risks, and the terms of the investment. A subscription agreement is typically a separate contractual document through which an investor formally agrees to purchase an interest and makes certain representations to the issuer. They are usually delivered together but serve different functions.
Does a PPM guarantee that my investment is protected?
No. A PPM discloses risk and documents the terms of an offering. It does not eliminate the underlying risks of the investment, including the risk of loss.
What is the difference between a Rule 506(b) and a Rule 506(c) offering?
In general terms, Rule 506(b) permits an offering to include a limited number of non-accredited but sophisticated investors and prohibits general solicitation, while Rule 506(c) permits general solicitation and advertising but requires the issuer to take reasonable steps to verify that all investors are accredited. Which exemption applies to a given offering depends on how that offering is structured.
If the property loses value, can I get my money back?
Not typically, and not solely on that basis. A decline in property value is generally treated as a disclosed investment risk rather than grounds for return of capital, absent a misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, or breach of the governing documents.
Should I have an attorney review a PPM before investing?
Independent legal and financial review of any offering's specific documents is generally advisable before making an investment decision. This article discusses general concepts only and is not a substitute for that review.
How Kaelus Law Can Help
Kaelus Law works with real estate sponsors and fund managers on the formation and documentation of syndications structured under Regulation D and related exemptions, including the following.
Drafting and revising private placement memoranda, subscription agreements, and operating agreements for real estate funds and single-asset syndications.
Structuring offerings under Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c), depending on the sponsor's intended investor base and marketing approach.
Advising on exemption compliance under Section 5 of the Securities Act, including analysis relevant to state blue sky requirements.
Drafting risk factor disclosures, distribution waterfall provisions, and manager indemnification and exculpation language tailored to a specific transaction.
Advising sponsors on fiduciary duty considerations and conflict of interest disclosures in connection with an offering.
Reviewing existing fund documents for investors or sponsors seeking an independent assessment prior to a capital raise or investment decision.
Kaelus Law's practice is built around direct access to lead counsel throughout a transaction, rather than delegation to junior staff, with the goal of turning around documentation on a timeline that matches the pace of the deal.
This section describes the general scope of Kaelus Law's practice and does not constitute an offer to provide legal services for any specific transaction. Engagement of Kaelus Law is subject to a signed engagement letter and a conflicts of interest review.
Kaelus Law, PLLC attorneys are licensed in California, Arizona, Illinois, Texas, and North Carolina. This article does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. For questions regarding a specific offering or investment, please contact us.
Kaelus Law
Precision. Alignment. Resolution.
Contact us at 833-900-7890 or info@kaeluslaw.com for more information.
